Markwell Clarizio LLP

canada

Federal Court of Appeal Clarifies the Test for Overbreadth and the Territorial Limits on Infringement

On March 20, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (per Locke J.A., Roussel J.A., and Heckman J.A.) (“FCA”) released an important decision in the patent dispute between ProSlide and WhiteWater, two competitors in the water slide industry. The ruling restores the validity of three of ProSlide’s patents relating to water slides but confirms that WhiteWater […]

Federal Court of Appeal Clarifies the Test for Overbreadth and the Territorial Limits on Infringement Read More »

Federal Court of Appeal: Don’t Kiss Online Trademark Confusion Surveys Goodbye           

On February 25, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (per De Montigny C.J., Webb J.A. and Pamel J.A.) (“FCA”) upheld a Federal Court decision (discussed in our previous blog post) that Promotion in Motion Inc. (“PIM”)’s trademarks SWISSKISS and SWISSKISS & Design (in association with Swiss chocolate) were not registrable in light of Hershey Chocolate

Federal Court of Appeal: Don’t Kiss Online Trademark Confusion Surveys Goodbye            Read More »

New Owner Jurisprudence – FCA Accepts a Flexible Interpretation of Section 45 of the Trademarks Act

In a decision issued January 9, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (per LeBlanc JA, Roussel JA, and Heckman JA) (“FCA”) upheld the Federal Court’s (“FC”) decision to maintain three of Coors Brewing Company’s (“Coors”) trademark registrations related to beer products (collectively “the Trademarks”). The FC had held there were special circumstances that excused the

New Owner Jurisprudence – FCA Accepts a Flexible Interpretation of Section 45 of the Trademarks Act Read More »

Patients Are A Relevant Consumer in the Trademark Confusion Analysis For Biosimilars

Co-authored with Emily Johnston On November 28, 2025, the Federal Court of Appeal (Per Woods JA and Laskin JA) (“FCA”) held that the Federal Court (per Pallotta J) (“FC”) did not err in (1) enjoining Samsung Bioepis (“Samsung”) and Biogen, et al (collectively “Biogen”), as well as their licensees, from using the trademark BYOOVIZ in

Patients Are A Relevant Consumer in the Trademark Confusion Analysis For Biosimilars Read More »

Federal Court Goes All-In on Claim Construction in Assessing Patentable Subject Matter

Co-authored with Adam Haller On November 12, 2025, the Federal Court (per Whyte Nowak J.) held that the Commissioner of Patents (the “Commissioner”) made several errors of law in finding that an application for a “Method for Playing a Card Game” did not qualify as patentable subject matter under the Patent Act. The Court remitted

Federal Court Goes All-In on Claim Construction in Assessing Patentable Subject Matter Read More »

Common Design Infringement Finds its Footing in Canada

In the latest chapter of the Adeia Guides Inc. (formerly “Rovi”) (“Adeia”) and Videotron Ltd. (“Videotron”) patent infringement battle, Adeia alleged that Videotron infringed four patents within the same family related to digital entertainment technologies. Videotron denied infringement and counterclaimed for invalidity on the basis of anticipation, obviousness, and in the case of one patent,

Common Design Infringement Finds its Footing in Canada Read More »

Summary Judgment Denied in a Riveting Rosie Copyright Battle

Co-authored by Dino Clarizio On January 31, 2025, the Federal Court (per Gascon J.) dismissed a motion for summary judgment in a copyright infringement action involving a “Rosie the Riveter” design because the moving party failed to prove that there was no “genuine issue” for trial. The Court found that, on the facts and law,

Summary Judgment Denied in a Riveting Rosie Copyright Battle Read More »

Importance of Brand Strength: The Arc of Confusion in Physio Health Trademark

On February 14, 2025, the Federal Court (per Fuhrer J.) found that Joanna Habbous, owner of the registered trademark PHYSIOHEALTH STUDIOS, had established infringement, passing off, and depreciation of goodwill against Arc Physio Health Ltd. The application was, however, dismissed against the named personal Respondents. Habbous v. Arc Physio Health Ltd., 2025 FC 297 Background Ms.

Importance of Brand Strength: The Arc of Confusion in Physio Health Trademark Read More »